Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK2 1.9.11-RC1 is now tagged

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 14 Jun 2017 15:02:47 +0200
From Thomas Brand <[hidden] at trellis dot ch>
To"\"Stéphane Letz\"" <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
Cc"[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org" <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToStéphane Letz Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK2 1.9.11-RC1 is now tagged
On Wed, June 14, 2017 14:17, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>

>> Le 14 juin 2017 à 14:14, Kjetil Matheussen <[hidden]>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Kjetil Matheussen
>> <[hidden]> wrote:
>> Great news Filipe!
>>
>>
>> I'm happy that you are the new maintainer.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just to be clear, Stephane did a very good job too of course.
>>
>>
>>
>>> The reason is that we have already had a 1.9.11 release for Windows
>>> (when you go to jackaudio.org and download for windows, you find
>>> 1.9.11).
>>>
>>
>> Also, the last OSX release is placed under a "1.9.11" directory, so I
>> guess that one is a 1.9.11 release as well.
>
> The latest JackOSX 0.93 package was indeed based on jackd 1.9.11. Having
> a same numbering for OS X stuff would certainly help. The hard part is to
> create this OS X specific package again.
>
> Stéphane

Hi,
i'm just thinking out loud for releases -

Hand-crafting a release for OS X or Windows sounds like serious magic for
most people while for Linux it's relatively straight forward.

If there would be a release process that's doing all the hard work
automatically, a new release wouldn't bind resources that are more
valuable to invest in other aspects. There wouldn't be -RC releases and
found to be good binaries would be just a specific release out of a
(RC-style release) series.

IMO the Ardour project is a good example of how to handle releases. They
manage to automatically create binaries (in several variations) for Linux,
OS X and Windows on a daily basis.
While the JACK codebase won't change on a daily basis, the release process
can be handy nonetheless. I wondered if some of the Ardour build
infrastructure could be re-used for JACK? Like surfing on the same wave.
Robin could do it i'm sure - I'm wondering if this is looked at as a
reasonable proposal. I'm sure we'd find community members to sponsor the
needed initial work in some way to people who can do it.
Any thoughts?

Best regards
Thomas
PrevNext  Index

1497445493.28688_0.ltw:2,a <b9f015a8477d3b407ce446e25b907050.squirrel at ips73 dot ips dot ch>