Re: [Jack-Devel] Cannot combine audio devices with more than 64 channels

Thanks for your answer!

In your first mail, you write
> Zita-ajbridge will detect the relative period phases, and insert
buffering so as to ensure that the difference in latency is always the same.
That sounds to me like the two cards get additional latency, but it will be
exactly the same so their outputs remain in correct phase.

However, in your second mail, you write:
> Without resampling the samples will not be modified, but the latency of
the two cards will not be the same (but the difference will be repeatable).
That sounds like the very opposite.

So will there be any additional latency when using zita? Can it be
configured to be the same for all cards? Could the latency be configured to
something minimal like 64 samples?


2017-01-24 20:45 GMT+01:00 Fons Adriaensen <[hidden]>:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Jörg Müller wrote:
>
> > However, the information needs to be unaltered, no resampling or any
> > modification is allowed for our processing. What command line settings
> do I
> > have to use to make sure of that? How can I use the official
> zita-ajbridge
> > or is there some documentation about it?
>
> Use the -h option or man zita-a2j or man zita-j2a.
>
> Without resampling the samples will not be modified, but the latency
> of the two cards will not be the same (but the difference will be
> repeatable).
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>

1485353966.16378_0.ltw:2,a <CAKw=HF1a-9xReeeKmGU7TB8Vei0kog2U+8NotzNVtz56afW3SQ at mail dot gmail dot com>