Re: [Jack-Devel] netJACK2 with two nodes

PrevNext  Index
DateTue, 19 Jul 2016 08:13:38 +0300
From Athanasios Silis <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
ToFons Adriaensen <[hidden] at linuxaudio dot org>
CcDevelopers JACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToFons Adriaensen Re: [Jack-Devel] netJACK2 with two nodes
Follow-Upxan Re: [Jack-Devel] netJACK2 with two nodes
Hi Fons,
i'm not implying there was something wrong with zita-*2*, i'm sure in fact
it is some network issue that caused the jitter from the speakers, it was
nonetheless a jitter.
Now where zita-*2* offered jitter ,alsa_* did not , provided the same
arguments where used (ie for low latency).

I am sure had I spend more time on it I would have found a solution - i do
not question zita-* is "future" while alsa_* is "obsolete", but for the
given transition to zita-* , I had to revert to alsa_*

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Fons Adriaensen <[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:32:29PM +0300, Athanasios Silis wrote:
>
> > in a similar setup zita* stuff has not worked great for me - I got alot
> of
> > noise , so I switched to using the more primitive alsa_in and alsa_out.
>
> There a many ways a link using zita-*2* can go wrong, depending on
> network performance and if your Jack systems by themselves are OK
> or not. But 'noise' is not one of the possible results.
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> 
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> [hidden]
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>
PrevNext  Index

1468905229.17357_0.ltw:2,a <CADgchnu6UaFfDRKozrZWdnd_K2WS8-isQYzJ6tqRCjO-99su+Q at mail dot gmail dot com>