Re: [Jack-Devel] Client-Server models are just fine. Please?

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Kjetil Matheussen <[hidden]>
wrote:

>
>
> Two reasons:
> 1. No need to use anything other than Jack. Ardour now has got the option
> of not using Jack. Shouldn't
> have been necessary.
>

if you believe this, then clearly you do not understand why we did this.


> 2. It feels like a server configuration protocol will stabilize faster if
> clients also can function as servers
> since more code is using it, not just qjackctl.
>

the server configuration protocol has existed for nearly 8 years. almost
nobody has chosen to use it, for anything at all. jackdbus is more or less
its only use case.


>
>
> It works, but the more components you glue together, the higher the chance
> is for something
> to fail. For instance didn't the messages window in the windows version of
> qjackctl show anything
> coming from jackd until autumn 2015.
>

that has to do with windows and qjackctl, not with jackd.

1454335358.15622_0.ltw:2, <CAFa_cKkea4E68vrkzBZxbhdk2EG_FrDXJ52FU_DXn1VV5Jprpw at mail dot gmail dot com>