Re: [Jack-Devel] stepping down

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Kjetil Matheussen <[hidden]
> wrote:

>
> I think so too, but I meant to say that, as a user, I always start jackd
> first since I don't want
> to risk a client to start jackd in a way I don't feel sure about.
>

it starts it the way you started it last time!


>
> It would be better if this information was available in a function in
> libjack so that
> clients can show what's happening.
>

what information?


>
> Yes. First you imagine what would be perfect. Later we can worry about
> reality.
>

I don't anything perfect about jack_lsp popping up a GUI dialog to
configure a server. I don't see anything good about a careful constructed
GUI application having to deal with the reality of a new dialog being
created. this isn't even close to perfect.

what problem are you actually concerned with fixing? what users does it
affect? when?

1454275507.26692_0.ltw:2, <CAFa_cKkHQrZBQ9gTEqEd-okKG1-4vihHN7TAzP6-U8N+VDjqLg at mail dot gmail dot com>