Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack 2: how to improve reliability by allowing greater latency?

PrevNext  Index
DateFri, 22 May 2015 06:56:37 -0400
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToTorben Hohn <[hidden] at linutronix dot de>
CcJACK <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>
In-Reply-ToPaul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack 2: how to improve reliability by allowing greater latency?
Follow-UpAndré Pinto Re: [Jack-Devel] Netjack 2: how to improve reliability by allowing greater latency?
but it also hasn't been updated to be able to use opus, in the way that it
was in the jack2 tree (robin gareus did this a couple of years ago).

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Paul Davis <[hidden]>
wrote:

> netjack 1 hasn't been modified in four years, at least not in the jack1
> source tree.
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Torben Hohn <[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 02:28:50PM -0500, David Nielson wrote:
>> > I was hoping someone who knows more would chime in. It's been a LONG
>> > time since I used Netjack, but I thought there was an option to add
>> > extra periods of latency, specifically for what you're requesting? And
>> > it was this capability that allowed some people back in the day to do
>> > recording sessions internationally?
>>
>> That was realised with netjack ONE.
>> It can tolerate packet loss.
>>
>> However, that was more than 4 years ago.
>> I dont know about the current state of things.
>>
>> --
>> Torben Hohn
>>
>> 
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>>
>>
>
PrevNext  Index

1432292202.7065_0.ltw:2, <CAFa_cKnYVQMhU=ZsV=S9k0O_4N_sWxDf7dEU_oj_zsZNW6YJDQ at mail dot gmail dot com>