Re: [Jack-Devel] Proper JACK Build tools?

PrevNext  Index
DateFri, 14 Nov 2014 19:40:58 +0100
From Stéphane Letz <[hidden] at grame dot fr>
ToMatthew Logan <[hidden] at kskelectrics dot com>
Cc[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToMatthew Logan Re: [Jack-Devel] Proper JACK Build tools?
Follow-UpMatthew Logan Re: [Jack-Devel] Proper JACK Build tools?
Nothing more I remember of.

St鰨ane 

Le 14 nov. 2014 ࠱9:01, "Matthew Logan" <[hidden]> a 飲it :

> Thanks for the link.  I will give it a try.  So is there anything I have to
> set up more than the exe compiler commands in Code::Blocks to make this
> work?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: St鰨ane Letz [mailto:[hidden]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:18 AM
> To: Matthew Logan
> Cc: [hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] Proper JACK Build tools?
> 
> I did use http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net tool chain in Code::Blocks  when I
> installed (years ago…) a VirtualBox to compile JACK on Windows.
> 
> St鰨ane
> 
> 
> Le 14 nov. 2014 ࠱7:54, Matthew Logan <[hidden]> a 飲it :
> 
>> Hello, I have one week to get Jack running properly on Win 8.1 and fix
> those client-close freezes that are still irritating.  I have more than a
> decade of experience designing audio engines for the likes of Sonic Foundry
> in their professional audio editing tools, so technically, I am up to the
> task.  But where I am withering is setting up the tool chain to actually dig
> into the task
>> 
>> I’ve got a branch set up from JACK via git, and the docs in in suggest
> Code::Blocks 10.05 and MinGW/SJLJ – is that still a requirement?  I have
> both installed, but I must be missing some configuration magic, because when
> I try to build JackLib I get an error message suggesting the compiler is not
> configured properly.
>> 
>> This morning I am working on trying to Install the MinGW version of
> Code::Blocks 10.05 and see if I can at least get a build going with that,
> even it the SJLJ thing fails that will get me moving.  But I could sure use
> some advice from someone who has built JACK recently for Windows – otherwise
> I am going to have to flail around the continuum of tool possibilities until
> I stumble on the right combination.
>> 
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
> 
> 
PrevNext  Index

1415990470.25204_0.ltw:2, <E0926DCE-912A-46AE-AE09-49852CE8632B at grame dot fr>