Prev | Next Index |
Date | Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:33:41 +0200 |
From | Hanspeter Portner <[hidden] at airpost dot net> |
To | [hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org |
In-Reply-To | Matt Flax Re: [Jack-Devel] filtering for jack net clients |
Follow-Up | Paul Davis Re: [Jack-Devel] filtering for jack net clients |
On 24.07.2014 01:57, Matt Flax wrote: > I think it would be far better if we defined a reserved keyword for > these ports (currently _slave_ but not reserved) ... we could have it > defined in the header files. Similarly for the system client name > 'system'. > Why not use the new metadata API with a to be agreed upon metadata key - value pair instead to mark netjack1/2 ports?
Prev | Next Index |
1406194429.6011_0.ltw:2, <53D0D2F5.9040701 at airpost dot net>