Re: [Jack-Devel] Problems with audioadapter used with capture only interface

PrevNext  Index
DateSun, 29 Dec 2013 22:45:43 +0100
From Jeremy Jongepier <[hidden] at autostatic dot com>
To[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org
In-Reply-ToWojciech Zabolotny Re: [Jack-Devel] Problems with audioadapter used with capture only interface
Follow-UpWojciech Zabolotny Re: [Jack-Devel] Problems with audioadapter used with capture only interface
On 12/29/2013 10:38 PM, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> 29-12-2013 19:32, "Jeremy Jongepier" <[hidden]> napisa³(a):
>>
>> On 12/29/2013 01:27 AM, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I wanted to use jack2 with an embedded system equipped with capture
>>> only interface.
>>> I can start the server with the net backend:
>>
>> Hello Wojciech,
>>
>> Why the net backend? It seems as if you want to use the capture only
>> interface on a standalone embedded device.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> the whole design is a WiFi based wireless guitar system.
> Therefore the audio samples must be transmitted to the jack running on a PC
> working as a virtual amplifier and the Digital Audio Workstation.
> In fact I'm still considering getting rid of jack at the embedded system
> side. From the latency point of view the optimal solution would be to
> transmit the data directly from the soundcard via net to something like
> modified alsa_in on the PC. I have even considered making of virtual ALSA
> card with network input.
> Regards,
> Wojtek

Hi Wojtek,

Thanks for the explanation! Sounds like a cool idea. Why not run the
virtual amp directly on the embedded device? Not enough processing
power? And of course you could try using ALSA directly but from personal
experience I can say that using JACK might just be the easiest option.

Best,

Jeremy

>> 
>> Jack-Devel mailing list
>> [hidden]
>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
>>
> 
PrevNext  Index

1388353551.2349_0.ltw:2, <52C09807.1030600 at autostatic dot com>