Re: [Jack-Devel] What is exact license of applications in example-clients directory?

PrevNext  Index
DateWed, 27 Nov 2013 10:00:13 -0500
From Paul Davis <[hidden] at linuxaudiosystems dot com>
ToNeil C Smith <[hidden] at neilcsmith dot net>
Ccjack-devel <[hidden] at lists dot jackaudio dot org>, 김정연 <[hidden] at gmail dot com>
In-Reply-ToNeil C Smith Re: [Jack-Devel] What is exact license of applications in example-clients directory? 
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Neil C Smith <[hidden]> wrote:

> On 27 Nov 2013 13:30, "Paul Davis" <[hidden]> wrote:
> > all code derived from jack1 (as the example clients are) is released
> under the GPLv2 (except the library (libjack), which is LGPL)
> >
>
> Is there a reason examples aren't just public domain? It's useful for
> developers to have examples that do things properly that they can build on
> without worrying about licencing issues.
>

i would worry about the example clients being used in this way. in most
cases they exist to serve a didactic role, not to be the basis of an actual
program/client. the "tools" folder does the latter.

but i take the point ...
PrevNext  Index

1385564420.14718_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKmTHui+-Jx6jcJdcrY2CBw1sG3+8MU8=bXNVp1Pcid7iA at mail dot gmail dot com>