Re: [Jack-Devel] [jack1] building without zita

Yeah well, alright. I started trying to find a good revision two weeks
ago but gave up hoping I could just use the latest.

By most recent tarball you mean 0.121.3? That has alignment traps on
both systems unfortunately. I am trying to test with the latest
versions anyway so it's more useful.




On 7 November 2013 02:02, Paul Davis <[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Kaspar Bumke <[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> I would still like to be able to compile it without the libzita stuff
>> for now. Apart from this (Debian) system I want to compile it for
>> another ARM system which has no real package manager or libzita
>> packages. It's a buildroot compile and I am not sure how I would get
>> over the circular dependency there. But if you say it isn't possible
>> do you know off hand around when this was introduced?
>>
>> I am trying to track down and report some alignment traps encountered
>> on one ARM system but not the other...
>
>
> git log will show everything. just reset or checkout the revision before i
> added it. or use the most recent tarball release.
>
>

1383790682.841_0.ltw:2,a <CAB+dmjh-=H0dh_684zhKxfRDrZhO2td=NGv_3L2=SixOt1z9Hg at mail dot gmail dot com>