[Jack-Devel] AVB
On 09/20/2013 04:42 PM, Mann, Eric wrote:
> Maybe Im mis-understanding the device, but you can generally do < 64
> byte DMA transfers over PCIe
they are called partials. They arent
> particularly efficient from a bus and memory utilization perspective ..
> you start to see the inefficiency as you approach back-to-back
> transfers -> 1 usec (at least on current CPUs
some 6+ yr old laptop
> its probably in the 10-20 usec area
close to a 48KHz sample rate
).
>
> The current state of the art for low-latency **anything** is to avoid
> interrupts (as an interrupt itself is ~1-2 usec of processing latency)
> either in-kernel (e.g. 3.11s low-latency sockets) or in user space.
>
> Eric Mann / Intel Networking Division
totally off-topic, but good to see AVB people lurking on (and
contributing to) jack-devel.
lurking on the AVB list myself, after adi+christoph got me interested at
LAC 2013.
i wonder if we could dedicate some spacetime at LAC 2014 to AVB related
issues again...
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
1379880216.16902_0.ltw:2, <523F4D0F.2070005 at stackingdwarves dot net>