Re: [Jack-Devel] JACK 1.9.10 to test (for 64/32 bits compatibility)
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <[hidden]> wrote:
>
> JACK code should either
>
> use natural alignment (all components are built with same ABI) and get
> all but 32/64 bit (wine) problems solved
>
> or
>
> use the packed structs with explicit padding approach and get all
> problems solved with more work by JACK developers.
>
or not use structs at all, only opaque pointers. we do this for almost all
of the API and should never really have exposed structs at all.
1357744505.11796_0.ltw:2,a <CAFa_cKmQgXhLugfWFJ6KhpAKRKgp6dMGGD8Y2q8EnBu7rerkWA at mail dot gmail dot com>